Insights
2027-07-15 00:00 Asset Tracing &amp Recovery

How does Russian law regulate third-party disclosure orders in Russian proceedings at the freezing and interim relief stage?

Russian civil procedure does not contain a mechanism directly equivalent to a third-party disclosure order as understood in English or common-law proceedings. There is no provision permitting a creditor to compel a bank, accountant, or other third party to disclose information about a debtor's assets as a freestanding interim remedy in the way that Norwich Pharmacal or Bankers Trust orders operate. Foreign creditors pursuing asset tracing and recovery in Russian proceedings at the freezing and interim relief stage should treat disclosure as an ancillary procedural tool rather than an independent cause of action.

The framework governing disclosure in Russian civil and arbitrazh proceedings rests on two distinct mechanisms. First, a court may, on application by a party, issue a formal request to a third party – including a bank, state registry, or regulatory authority – to produce documents or information relevant to the proceedings. This is the judicial evidence request procedure, available in both general jurisdiction and commercial (arbitrazh) court proceedings. Second, at the interim relief stage, the court's power to secure a claim includes the ability to prohibit third parties from performing acts that would dissipate disputed assets. A third party served with a securing order is legally obliged to comply and to refrain from any transaction that the order specifies. Neither mechanism, however, compels unsolicited asset disclosure by third parties in advance of or independent from substantive proceedings.

In practice, foreign creditors seeking information about a Russian debtor's assets at the freezing stage have three main routes available. A court-issued inquiry to Rosreestr, the Federal Tax Service, or the Central Bank can yield property, tax registration, and banking relationship data – but only once proceedings are on foot and the court has jurisdiction. If the debtor holds assets offshore or through layers of Russian holding structures, the evidential picture at the interim stage will often be incomplete; courts in Russia do not routinely make sweeping disclosure orders against third parties equivalent to a full asset disclosure order under English law. The more effective approach for foreign creditors is to secure the claim first – obtaining a freezing order over identifiable Russian assets – and then to use the evidence request procedure in parallel to broaden the asset picture. Our longer analysis of this area is set out in Third-Party Disclosure Orders in Russian Proceedings: A Legal Update and the accompanying Practical Guide to Third-Party Disclosure Orders. The firm's Asset Tracing & Recovery practice page sets out how the firm approaches these matters for foreign creditors.

For foreign creditors with live recovery proceedings in Russia, understanding the limits of the disclosure framework before applying for interim relief materially affects the strategy. Applying for a freezing order over assets that have not yet been identified carries procedural risk; equally, delaying the interim application while evidence is gathered may allow dissipation. Make an enquiry to discuss your matter in confidence: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp / Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76.

— Elizaveta Razina Senior Lawyer, Practice Lead — IP Enforcement, Vetrov & Partners vetrovpartners.com/razina/

Elizaveta Razina leads the firm's intellectual property and asset protection practice, representing foreign creditors and rights holders in enforcement and tracing proceedings before Russian state courts and the IP Court. She has been with the firm since 2012.

This publication is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice under Russian or any other applicable law. The information herein should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal counsel tailored to your specific circumstances. Vetrov & Partners is a Russian-qualified law firm. For matters governed by foreign law or requiring local admission in another jurisdiction, we collaborate with trusted counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. For advice regarding your particular situation, please contact info@vetrovpartners.com.