Compliance checklist: currency control and profit repatriation in Georgia for Indian-owned groups

Georgian currency law is relatively liberal compared with most post-Soviet jurisdictions — but Indian-owned groups operating through Georgian entities regularly encounter compliance gaps precisely because they assume that liberalism means an absence of rules. It does not. Georgia imposes reporting obligations, documentation standards, and in certain cases prior notification requirements on outbound transfers of capital and distributed profits. On the Indian side, the Foreign Exchange Management Act governs how resident Indian entities and individuals receive funds from foreign subsidiaries, and the Reserve Bank of India's master directions on overseas investment have tightened documentation expectations since 2022. For in-house counsel managing a Georgian subsidiary or branch from an Indian parent, the compliance exposure sits on both ends of the transfer chain simultaneously.

This checklist addresses the seven principal compliance points that Indian-owned groups should verify before executing a profit repatriation or capital transfer from a Georgian entity.

Not all Georgian entity forms carry equivalent profit distribution mechanics. A limited liability company (LLC — "SHPTs") distributes profit by resolution of the participants; a joint-stock company follows a separate dividend-declaration procedure; a branch of a foreign company remits funds as internal transfers, which are treated differently from dividends for both Georgian and Indian tax purposes.

Before initiating any repatriation, confirm: (a) the entity type, (b) whether the constitutional documents permit distributions at the proposed frequency, and (c) whether the current accounting period has been formally closed and audited. Georgian law does not prohibit interim distributions in all cases, but undistributed profit calculations must be based on verified financial statements — an unaudited balance sheet creates documentation risk at the Georgian bank level and may trigger withholding tax reclassification queries.

Note: Georgian tax legislation imposes corporate income tax on profit at the point of distribution, not accrual. This means tax does not arise until a distribution decision is made. Reversing a distribution decision after the tax event has been triggered carries its own procedural complexity. Confirm the finalised distributable amount before formalising the resolution.

Georgia applies a standard withholding tax on dividends paid to non-resident shareholders. The standard rate has historically been 5%, applicable to dividends paid from an Estonian-model corporate income tax system entity. However, the rate applicable to a specific Indian shareholder depends on whether the India–Georgia double taxation avoidance agreement is operative and whether the conditions for reduced withholding are met in the specific payment structure.

Indian-owned groups frequently assume the treaty rate applies automatically. It does not. The Georgian paying entity must hold valid proof of the Indian shareholder's tax residency — typically a tax residency certificate issued by the Indian tax authorities — before applying a reduced rate. Absent that certificate at the time of payment, the Georgian entity should withhold at the standard rate and the shareholder may subsequently seek a refund, which is procedurally available but time-consuming.

Note: If the Georgian entity is registered under the Virtual Zone or International Company regime, the distribution rules and applicable tax rates differ from the standard CIT framework. Verify the entity's tax status before applying any rate. Applying an incorrect rate — whether too low or too high — creates a reconciliation obligation with the Georgian Revenue Service.

[CTA: For a treaty position analysis specific to your group structure — make an enquiry: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

Georgia's currency liberalisation, implemented progressively since the early 2000s, removed most prior-authorisation requirements for current account transactions and a significant proportion of capital account transactions. Dividend repatriation from a Georgian resident entity to a non-resident shareholder is, as a general rule, a current account transaction and does not require advance registration with the National Bank of Georgia.

However, three categories of transfer attract heightened scrutiny and, in some cases, notification requirements: (a) transfers involving counterparties in jurisdictions on the Georgian financial intelligence unit's (AMLO) monitoring list; (b) transfers where the individual transaction amount exceeds the threshold triggering enhanced due diligence at the correspondent bank level; and (c) transfers characterised as loan repayments, royalties, or service fees rather than dividends — these may require supporting documentation of the underlying arrangement before the Georgian bank will process the instruction.

Indian-owned groups using intercompany service agreements or licensing arrangements to repatriate value (rather than formal dividend distributions) should confirm with their Georgian bank whether the transaction characterisation is accepted and whether additional documentation is required before the transfer date.

Note: Mischaracterising a capital transfer as a current account transaction — whether intentionally or through poor documentation — may trigger a review by the Georgian Revenue Service under anti-avoidance provisions applicable to related-party transactions. Ensure that the transfer description in the payment instruction matches the supporting corporate and contractual documentation exactly.

Profit repatriation from Georgia to an Indian corporate shareholder triggers reporting obligations under the Foreign Exchange Management Act and the RBI's master directions on overseas direct investment and foreign exchange transactions. The Indian entity receiving the funds must report the receipt within the prescribed timeframe using the applicable RBI return. Failure to file the return — even where the receipt itself is wholly permissible — constitutes a FEMA violation, and the compounding mechanism for late filings, while available, carries a cost and administrative burden that is disproportionate to the underlying omission.

For Indian individual shareholders receiving dividends from Georgian entities — a structure used in some first-generation relocation setups where an Indian national holds Georgian equity personally — the Liberalised Remittance Scheme reporting obligations apply separately from the corporate FEMA framework. The applicable route and reporting form differ depending on whether the recipient is an Indian company, an Indian-resident individual, or an Indian-resident individual who is also a director or key managerial person of the Georgian entity.

Note: The RBI's 2022 amendments to the overseas investment framework reclassified certain types of Georgian entity interests held by Indian residents. Groups that structured their Georgian holdings prior to 2022 should confirm that the current characterisation of the holding remains consistent with the applicable RBI reporting category, since misclassification affects which return is filed and whether prior approval is required for the receipt.

[CTA: If your group's Georgian holdings were structured before 2022 and have not been reviewed under the revised RBI overseas investment framework — make an enquiry: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

A dividend received by an Indian company from a Georgian subsidiary is taxable in India as income from foreign sources. Since the abolition of the dividend distribution tax regime in India, dividends from foreign subsidiaries are includible in the Indian parent's gross total income and taxed at the applicable corporate rate, with a credit available for foreign taxes withheld in Georgia — subject to the terms of the India–Georgia double tax avoidance agreement and the Indian domestic rules on foreign tax credit.

The credit mechanism is not automatic. The Indian entity must maintain Georgian tax withholding certificates and supporting documentation to substantiate the credit claim. Where the Georgian withholding rate was applied incorrectly (see item 2 above), the Indian tax credit calculation will be affected, creating a cascading compliance error across both jurisdictions.

Indian individual shareholders face a different calculation: the dividend is taxed as income from other sources at the applicable slab rate, and the foreign tax credit claim follows the individual taxpayer's treaty and domestic provisions. In practice, Indian individuals in higher tax brackets may find the overall effective rate on Georgian-source dividends materially higher than anticipated when both jurisdictions' tax is considered together.

Georgian commercial banks — particularly those processing significant cross-border transfers to India — apply correspondent bank compliance requirements that go beyond what Georgian law strictly mandates. In practice, the Georgian bank's compliance function will typically require: (a) a certified copy of the distribution resolution, (b) audited or management accounts confirming distributable profit, (c) the recipient's bank details and confirmation that the receiving bank account matches the shareholder register, and (d) in some cases, a letter from the Georgian entity's tax adviser confirming that withholding tax has been correctly calculated and remitted.

Processing timelines for transfers to India from Georgian banks vary. Where the Indian recipient's bank requires additional correspondent bank confirmations — which is not uncommon for transfers arriving from Georgian banks without an established correspondent relationship — the actual settlement timeline can extend materially beyond the Georgian bank's standard processing window.

For Indian-owned groups executing time-sensitive repatriations (for instance, to meet an Indian fiscal year-end dividend declaration), the correspondent bank timeline risk should be factored into the execution plan at least four to six weeks before the required value date.

Note: Georgian banks are required under anti-money laundering legislation to report outbound transfers that display indicators of unusual activity. A single large repatriation following a period of accumulated undistributed profit — a pattern common in groups that have been reinvesting Georgian earnings for several years — may attract an information request from the bank's compliance function before the transfer is released. Prepare the distribution history and retained earnings documentation in advance.

Where profit repatriation is structured partly or wholly through intercompany service fees, royalties, management charges, or interest on shareholder loans — rather than through formal dividend distributions — the transfer pricing rules applicable in both Georgia and India become directly relevant. Georgia's transfer pricing legislation, aligned with OECD guidelines, applies to transactions between related parties where at least one party is a Georgian resident. India's transfer pricing rules apply to international transactions between associated enterprises, and the Indian Revenue's scrutiny of outbound royalty and service fee payments has intensified in recent years.

Groups that have been using service fee arrangements to move value from Georgia to India should confirm: (a) that a contemporaneous transfer pricing documentation file exists for each category of intercompany charge, (b) that the arm's length analysis reflects current comparable data (not data from the year the arrangement was first established), and (c) that the Georgian entity has not inadvertently created a permanent establishment risk for the Indian parent through the scope of activities performed by the Georgian entity on the parent's behalf.

Note: A transfer pricing adjustment by the Georgian Revenue Service — reclassifying a service fee as a dividend — will trigger withholding tax, interest, and potentially a penalty, and will simultaneously affect the Indian parent's deduction claim. Transfer pricing misalignment is the single compliance risk most likely to produce a simultaneous multi-jurisdictional tax correction for Indian-owned Georgian groups.

[CTA: For a transfer pricing review across your Georgian and Indian entities — make an enquiry: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

• [Georgia Tax Overview for Foreign Investors](/jurisdictions/georgia/tax/)
• [Company Formation in Georgia: Guide for Foreign Nationals](/jurisdictions/georgia/company-formation/)
• [Tax Residency and Relocation to Georgia](/jurisdictions/georgia/tax-residency/)

Q: Is there a Georgian withholding tax on dividends paid to Indian shareholders? A: As a general rule, Georgia applies a withholding tax on dividends distributed to non-resident shareholders. The standard rate has historically been 5% under the Georgian CIT framework, though entities registered under special tax regimes — such as the Virtual Zone or International Company status — may be subject to different rates. Indian shareholders may be entitled to a reduced treaty rate under the India–Georgia double taxation avoidance agreement, but the reduced rate applies only if the Georgian entity holds a valid tax residency certificate from the Indian tax authority at the time of payment. Absent that certificate, the standard rate should be withheld and a refund sought subsequently through the Georgian Revenue Service.

Q: Does Georgia require prior approval for transferring dividends abroad? A: Georgia does not, as a general rule, require advance authorisation from the National Bank of Georgia for outbound dividend transfers, which are treated as current account transactions under Georgian currency legislation. However, the Georgian commercial bank through which the transfer is processed will apply its own compliance and anti-money laundering documentation requirements before releasing the payment. These bank-level requirements — including certified distribution resolutions, audited accounts, and in some cases tax confirmation letters — are separate from the regulatory authorisation question and should be prepared in advance to avoid processing delays.

Q: What Indian regulatory requirements apply when an Indian company receives a dividend from a Georgian subsidiary? A: Receipt of a dividend by an Indian corporate shareholder from a foreign subsidiary triggers reporting obligations under the Foreign Exchange Management Act and the Reserve Bank of India's master directions on overseas investment. The Indian entity must file the applicable RBI return within the prescribed timeframe to report the receipt. Late filing, even where the transaction itself is permissible, constitutes a FEMA violation subject to the RBI's compounding process. Indian individual shareholders receiving dividends from Georgian entities are subject to a separate reporting framework under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme. Groups should confirm the applicable reporting route before funds arrive, since the correct form depends on the recipient's category and the characterisation of the Georgian holding.

Vetrov & Partners is a boutique law firm established in 2009, recognised by Pravo-300 for eight consecutive years and listed as a trusted adviser by the German Consulate General in Novosibirsk.

The firm's Georgia / Tax practice advises Indian-owned groups and other foreign investors on currency control compliance, profit repatriation structuring, and cross-border tax positioning across Georgia and the wider post-Soviet region. This article was prepared with the assistance of a contributing regional analyst with direct knowledge of Georgian financial regulation and the India–Georgia investment corridor. Partner oversight is provided on every matter.

Enquiries: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp / Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76 | t.me/vitvetcom

This publication is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice under Russian or any other applicable law. The information herein should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal counsel tailored to your specific circumstances. Vetrov & Partners is a Russian-qualified law firm. For matters governed by foreign law or requiring local admission in another jurisdiction, we collaborate with trusted counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. For advice regarding your particular situation, please contact info@vetrovpartners.com.

— Nino Beridze Contributing Regional Analyst — Georgia, Vetrov & Partners vetrovpartners.com/contributions/