Procedural considerations in competition law and merger clearance in Kazakhstan in the transport and logistics sector

Foreign companies entering or consolidating in Kazakhstan's transport and logistics sector routinely underestimate the regulatory sequencing required under Kazakhstani competition law. Two parallel merger control regimes may apply simultaneously – the domestic framework administered by the Agency for the Protection and Development of Competition (APDC), and the supranational regime of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Understanding which thresholds are triggered, and in what order notifications must be filed, is the operative challenge for in-house counsel and foreign investors structuring acquisitions, joint ventures, or asset combinations in this sector.

Kazakhstani competition legislation establishes mandatory prior consent obligations for transactions that meet defined concentration thresholds. The relevant thresholds are framed by reference to the combined assets or turnover of the transaction parties, with specific figures set at the national level and subject to periodic revision by delegated regulation. Foreign companies are within scope where the transaction results in the acquisition of shares, assets, or rights of management over a Kazakhstani entity, or where it creates the ability to exercise material influence over competitive behaviour in the Kazakhstani market.

In the transport and logistics sector, threshold analysis requires particular care for three reasons. First, the sector is treated as strategically significant under Kazakhstani law, and the APDC has historically applied heightened scrutiny to horizontal combinations that affect freight corridor capacity, port or terminal access, and intermodal connectivity. Second, the market definition exercise in logistics is non-standard: the APDC has assessed relevant markets at the level of specific route corridors and infrastructure nodes rather than at a broad national level, which can produce a higher indicative market share for a transaction participant than the acquirer anticipates. Third, logistics companies operating across Kazakhstan, Russia, and Belarus are structurally exposed to EAEU supranational review: where a transaction meets the Eurasian Economic Commission's combined asset or turnover thresholds, a separate pre-closing notification to the EEC is required, and the two review processes run on different statutory timetables.

The domestic review period under Kazakhstani competition law is, as a general rule, 30 calendar days from acceptance of a complete filing, extendable where the APDC identifies grounds for an in-depth investigation. The EAEU supranational review operates on a different timetable governed by EEC procedural rules. Critically, neither approval is conditional on the other: a transaction that clears the EEC may still require separate APDC consent before closing, and vice versa.

For an inbound foreign investor acquiring a Kazakhstani freight forwarding or road haulage business, the practical sequence typically unfolds as follows. The first step is a threshold assessment conducted against the most recently published APDC threshold figures and the applicable EEC criteria, using audited financial data for all parties. Where both thresholds are met, counsel will ordinarily prepare two parallel filings, co-ordinating timing so that the longer review does not become the critical path item only after the shorter review has completed. Where only the domestic threshold is met, a single APDC filing is required, and the acquirer should obtain written confirmation of the APDC's acceptance of the filing as complete before commencing any integration steps.

A recurring procedural difficulty in logistics sector filings arises from the APDC's documentation requirements for the description of the competitive overlap. Standard merger control questionnaires in other jurisdictions ask for market share data at a national level; the APDC filing form requires route-level and infrastructure-level analysis. Acquirers who complete this section using aggregate national data frequently receive a request for supplementary information, which restarts the review clock. Preparing the filing with corridor-level data from the outset – even where this requires additional data collection from the target – materially reduces the risk of a supplementary information request.

A further practical consideration applies to transactions structured as the acquisition of rights over logistics infrastructure assets rather than share transfers. The APDC has taken the position, consistently in published decisions, that the acquisition of long-term operating rights over terminal capacity or rail access agreements can constitute a concentration subject to prior consent, even where no equity changes hands. Foreign acquirers who structure around share transfer thresholds by using asset or concession arrangements should obtain specific counsel advice on whether the proposed structure falls within the APDC's concentration definition before signing.

Note: Proceeding to closing before obtaining required APDC consent exposes the acquirer to the risk of the transaction being declared unlawful, unwinding obligations, and administrative penalties under Kazakhstani competition legislation. The APDC has the statutory authority to apply to a Kazakhstani court for an order unwinding a transaction completed without mandatory prior consent. There is no grace period or voluntary disclosure pathway that eliminates this risk retrospectively.

Foreign investors structuring transactions in Kazakhstan's transport and logistics sector should complete a threshold assessment as early as practicable in the transaction timeline – ideally before signing, and in any event before the parties begin exchanging competitively sensitive information at the due diligence stage. Where EAEU supranational thresholds are also implicated, the review timetable for both regimes should be mapped into the transaction timeline and reflected in conditions precedent to closing.

For companies already operating in the Kazakhstani logistics market and considering a joint venture or asset combination with a local partner, the same threshold analysis applies. The formation of a full-function joint venture operating in Kazakhstan's transport sector is treated as a concentration under both the domestic and EAEU frameworks where the relevant thresholds are met.

Vetrov & Partners advises foreign companies on cross-border matters between Russia and Kazakhstan, working with regional counsel in Kazakhstan for matters requiring Kazakhstani qualification. For matters at the Kazakhstan–Russia interface – including EAEU-level merger control, customs and trade regulation, and cross-border logistics arrangements – the firm coordinates with trusted local counsel to provide a consolidated analysis.

[CTA: If your transaction involves assets or operations in Kazakhstan's transport and logistics sector, make an enquiry: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

Vetrov & Partners is a Russian boutique law firm established in 2009, recognised by Pravo-300 for eight consecutive years. The firm advises foreign companies on cross-border regulatory and transactional matters at the Russia–Kazakhstan interface, including EAEU trade law, customs regulation, and market entry coordination. For matters requiring Kazakhstani legal qualification, the firm works with trusted regional counsel. We are a Russian-qualified law firm. For matters governed by Kazakhstani or other foreign law, we collaborate with trusted counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.

Enquiries: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp / Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76 | t.me/vitvetcom

• [Market entry and company formation in Kazakhstan for foreign investors](/jurisdictions/kazakhstan/company-formation/)
• [Regulatory licensing in Kazakhstan: sector-specific considerations](/jurisdictions/kazakhstan/regulatory-licensing/)
• [Cross-border disputes between Russian and Kazakhstani entities](/jurisdictions/kazakhstan/disputes/)

This publication is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice under Russian or any other applicable law. The information herein should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal counsel tailored to your specific circumstances. Vetrov & Partners is a Russian-qualified law firm. For matters governed by foreign law or requiring local admission in another jurisdiction, we collaborate with trusted counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. For advice regarding your particular situation, please contact info@vetrovpartners.com.

— Aigerim Serikbayeva Contributing Regional Analyst — Kazakhstan · EAEU trade, customs and market entry vetrovpartners.com/contributions/