VAT and indirect taxes in Uzbekistan in the construction and real estate sector: a checklist for foreign clients

Uzbekistan's construction and real estate sector has attracted sustained inbound foreign investment since the country's tax reform programme introduced a general VAT framework applicable to most sectors, including construction. For foreign companies entering this market — whether as developers, contractors, equipment suppliers, or joint-venture participants — the indirect tax treatment of their activities is neither intuitive nor uniform. The rules governing VAT registration, input tax recovery, withholding obligations on payments to non-residents, and the treatment of real estate transactions carry sector-specific features that differ materially from what investors encounter in neighbouring EAEU jurisdictions. This checklist identifies the six primary areas that foreign clients should verify before committing to a construction or real estate project in Uzbekistan.

[CTA: For a preliminary tax review of your proposed structure in Uzbekistan — make an enquiry: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

A foreign legal entity conducting taxable activities in Uzbekistan through a permanent establishment is subject to Uzbek VAT and must register with the tax authorities. The threshold for mandatory VAT registration applies to annual turnover from taxable supplies in Uzbekistan; entities whose turnover exceeds this threshold in a calendar year must register without delay.

The critical question for foreign construction companies is whether their in-country activities constitute a permanent establishment. Under Uzbek tax legislation, construction sites and assembly projects that operate for a period exceeding the relevant threshold — typically assessed on an annual basis — are treated as giving rise to a permanent establishment. A foreign contractor whose site crosses that duration is no longer operating as a pure non-resident: it acquires both corporate tax and VAT obligations.

Foreign companies providing services to Uzbek customers remotely — for example, design, engineering consultancy, or project management delivered from outside Uzbekistan — may trigger VAT obligations through the mechanism applicable to electronic and cross-border services. Where an Uzbek customer is a VAT-registered business, the reverse-charge mechanism commonly applies; where the customer is an unregistered individual or entity, the non-resident supplier may bear the compliance obligation directly.

Note: A foreign company that incorrectly assumes its construction activities fall below the permanent establishment threshold, and therefore does not register for VAT, may face back-assessments covering the entire project duration, together with interest and administrative penalties. Uzbek tax authorities have shown increasing focus on the construction sector when conducting cross-border compliance reviews.

Construction and installation works executed in Uzbekistan are treated as taxable supplies for VAT purposes when performed by a VAT-registered entity. The standard VAT rate applies to the full contract value, including materials incorporated into the works where the contractor supplies them. Where a developer or contractor structures the engagement as a supply of goods (prefabricated elements, modular structures) rather than a supply of services, the VAT treatment follows the supply-of-goods rules, but this distinction requires careful documentation.

Real estate transactions — the sale of residential and commercial property — carry a differentiated regime. The first sale of newly constructed residential premises by the developer is typically subject to VAT at the applicable rate. Subsequent resales of residential property by non-developer owners may be outside the scope of VAT or subject to reduced treatment, depending on the seller's registration status and the nature of the transaction. Commercial real estate sales are generally fully taxable.

Land transactions sit in a separate category. Land plots in Uzbekistan are not privately owned under the constitutional framework; instead, foreign and local companies hold land use rights. The transfer of land use rights is subject to a distinct treatment under Uzbek tax legislation that does not mirror the standard VAT treatment of movable goods or construction services.

Note: Mischaracterising a construction contract as a mixed supply — or failing to segregate taxable and potentially exempt components — can result in VAT being assessed on the full contract value without the benefit of any applicable exemption or reduced rate. Structuring advice should be obtained before contracts are executed.

[CTA: If your project involves a mixed construction and real estate structure in Uzbekistan, request a preliminary tax review: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

A VAT-registered entity conducting taxable construction activities in Uzbekistan is entitled to offset input VAT paid on goods and services used in those activities against its output VAT liability. The mechanics of this credit mechanism broadly follow a standard self-assessment model: the taxpayer declares output VAT on taxable supplies and subtracts creditable input VAT, remitting the net amount.

Several practical restrictions affect foreign-owned construction entities specifically. First, input VAT is recoverable only where the underlying purchase is documented with a compliant tax invoice issued by a registered Uzbek supplier; invoices from unregistered suppliers or non-resident service providers do not generate recoverable credits in the same way. Second, input VAT attributable to exempt supplies — if the project includes an exempt component, such as certain residential sales — must be apportioned; only the portion attributable to taxable activities is recoverable. Third, input VAT on business entertainment, certain passenger vehicles, and other categories subject to disallowance under Uzbek tax legislation is non-recoverable regardless of the taxpayer's overall status.

Where input VAT exceeds output VAT in a given period — a common position for large construction contractors in the early and mid-phases of a project, before significant revenue is invoiced — the excess may be carried forward or, subject to conditions, refunded. The refund procedure in Uzbekistan requires a verification process by the tax authority; timelines and documentation requirements should be assessed before a project's cash-flow model is finalised.

Note: Failure to maintain compliant documentation at the point of purchase — rather than attempting to reconstruct records at audit — is the most common cause of input VAT being disallowed in Uzbek tax reviews. A document-control protocol aligned with Uzbek tax requirements should be in place from the project's inception.

Where an Uzbek entity — including a foreign company's Uzbek subsidiary or permanent establishment — makes payments to a non-resident for services performed in Uzbekistan, withholding obligations may arise. The practical effect is that the Uzbek paying entity is required to calculate, withhold, and remit tax on behalf of the non-resident recipient.

For VAT purposes, the mechanism operates as follows: if an Uzbek VAT-registered entity procures taxable services from a non-resident who is not registered for VAT in Uzbekistan, the Uzbek entity applies the reverse charge, accounting for VAT on the supply as if it were both supplier and customer, and may then recover that VAT as input tax subject to the standard conditions. This mechanism is particularly relevant where foreign construction groups use intra-group service arrangements — management fees, technical services, intellectual property licences — with the Uzbek project entity as the paying party.

Under applicable double taxation conventions — Uzbekistan maintains a network of bilateral tax treaties, including with Russia, and CIS member states — withholding tax on dividends, royalties, and certain service payments may be reduced or eliminated. Treaty relief must be actively claimed; it is not applied automatically by the Uzbek paying entity. The documentary conditions for treaty relief, including the requirement to establish the non-resident's tax residency, must be satisfied before payment is made.

Note: Incorrectly applying a treaty rate — or applying a rate based on an outdated treaty version — can expose the Uzbek paying entity to assessments for the under-withheld amount, plus interest. Tax treaty positions in the CIS region should be verified at the date of each payment cycle, not only at project outset.

VAT is not the only indirect tax that foreign companies operating in Uzbekistan's construction and real estate sector should assess. Excise duties apply to a defined list of goods; for the construction sector, the most relevant categories are certain petroleum products (fuel used in construction machinery), specific categories of imported construction materials subject to customs duties, and — in some project configurations — certain other dutiable goods if the development includes relevant components.

Customs duties apply at the border to imported construction equipment, prefabricated materials, and specialist components. Uzbekistan is not a member of the Eurasian Economic Union, so EAEU common customs tariff rates do not apply; Uzbekistan applies its own national tariff schedule. Foreign investors who rely on assumptions derived from EAEU-member neighbouring markets — Kazakhstan, Russia — when estimating import costs for construction inputs should re-verify against the current Uzbek tariff schedule. Preferential rates may apply under applicable trade agreements, including those within the CIS framework.

Property tax applies to legal entities owning or holding use rights over real property in Uzbekistan. For construction projects that involve extended site activity before a building is formally commissioned, the property tax treatment of work-in-progress and uncompleted structures should be confirmed. Construction companies that acquire completed real estate as part of a project settlement may also face property tax obligations from the date of acquisition.

Note: Imported construction equipment temporarily brought into Uzbekistan for project use may qualify for temporary importation relief, avoiding full customs duty payment. The conditions for this relief — including the re-export obligation and the permitted duration — must be adhered to strictly; failure to re-export within the permitted period triggers full duty assessment on the equipment's customs value.

[CTA: To assess the full indirect tax exposure of a construction project in Uzbekistan — including customs and property tax — make an enquiry: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

A VAT-registered entity in Uzbekistan is required to file VAT returns on a monthly basis, with payment of the net VAT liability due within the statutory deadline following the close of each reporting period. Construction projects that span multiple financial years must maintain continuous compliance; there is no deferred-filing regime for long-term projects. Foreign-owned entities that allow compliance obligations to lapse during project phases when no invoicing occurs — for example, during mobilisation or design phases — risk late-filing penalties applying to every missed period.

The statute of limitations for tax assessments in Uzbekistan means that the Uzbek tax authority may open an audit covering a defined prior period. For foreign-owned entities in the construction sector, the practical consequence is that documentation supporting input VAT claims, permanent establishment positions, and treaty relief applications must be retained and accessible for that entire period, not merely for the current project year.

Penalties for non-compliance in Uzbek tax legislation operate on a graduated scale: penalties apply to underpaid tax, late-filed returns, and failures to register. The administrative penalty structure has been materially updated in recent years as part of the broader tax reform programme. Foreign clients should obtain a current summary of penalty rates before assessing residual tax risk in a project model.

Tax disputes in Uzbekistan may be contested through the administrative appeals procedure before the tax authority itself, and thereafter through the economic courts. Foreign investors protected by a bilateral investment treaty with Uzbekistan may also have access to international arbitration for certain treaty claims, including claims arising from tax measures that amount to expropriation or breach of fair and equitable treatment standards.

Note: The intersection between domestic tax compliance and bilateral investment treaty protection is a structuring point that inbound investors often overlook at the project design stage. Ensuring that the investment is made through an entity incorporated in a jurisdiction with a favourable investment treaty with Uzbekistan — and that the treaty's tax carve-out provisions have been assessed — should be part of the pre-investment legal review.

• [Tax considerations for foreign investors entering Uzbekistan](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/tax/)
• [Company formation and market entry in Uzbekistan](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/company-formation/)
• [Corporate governance and joint ventures in Uzbekistan](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/corporate-jv/)
• [Comparative indirect tax overview: Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Georgia](/insights/uz-tax-indirect-overview-cis-comparison/)

Q: Does a foreign construction company working on a single project in Uzbekistan always need to register for VAT?

A: Not automatically — the obligation depends on whether the activities constitute a permanent establishment under Uzbek tax law, and whether taxable turnover exceeds the statutory registration threshold. A construction or assembly site operating beyond the relevant duration threshold is treated as a permanent establishment, triggering both corporate tax and VAT registration. Short-term, low-value contracts may fall below the threshold, but this must be assessed project by project. Companies operating through an Uzbek subsidiary will typically find the subsidiary is the VAT-registered entity; the foreign parent is not directly exposed to Uzbek VAT registration, though withholding and transfer pricing rules still apply to intra-group payments.

Q: Can input VAT paid on imported construction materials be recovered against Uzbek VAT liabilities?

A: Input VAT paid at the Uzbek border on imported goods is creditable against the importer's output VAT liability, provided the importer is VAT-registered and the goods are used in taxable activities. The documentation requirement is a customs declaration evidencing VAT payment, held alongside standard accounting records. If the importing entity is not yet VAT-registered at the time of importation — because the project is at an early stage and the registration threshold has not been crossed — VAT paid at import cannot be retroactively credited. This is a common cash-flow issue for early-stage construction projects: completing VAT registration before significant importation begins is the practical way to preserve the credit.

Q: What happens if the Uzbek tax authority disputes the permanent establishment position of a foreign contractor?

A: If the tax authority challenges the position that the contractor's activities do not constitute a permanent establishment — for example, because the site has operated longer than disclosed — the authority may raise an assessment for unpaid corporate tax and VAT, plus interest and penalties. The contractor may challenge through administrative appeals and, if unsuccessful, through the economic courts. Where a bilateral tax treaty applies, the treaty's mutual agreement procedure may also be available. Consistent documentation of site duration, project scope, and the nature of activities performed is the principal risk-mitigation measure.

Vetrov & Partners is a Russian boutique law firm established in 2009, recognised by Pravo-300 for eight consecutive years. The firm advises foreign companies on cross-border legal matters across Russia and neighbouring jurisdictions, working with contributing regional analysts and trusted local counsel where matters require jurisdiction-specific expertise outside the Russian Federation.

The firm's tax and regional advisory work for Uzbekistan-focused mandates covers inbound investment structuring, tax compliance reviews, and cross-border dispute support. Enquiries relating to Uzbekistan matters are coordinated through the firm's central team.

Enquiries: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp / Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76 | t.me/vitvetcom

This publication is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice under Russian or any other applicable law. The information herein should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal counsel tailored to your specific circumstances. Vetrov & Partners is a Russian-qualified law firm. For matters governed by foreign law or requiring local admission in another jurisdiction, we collaborate with trusted counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. For advice regarding your particular situation, please contact info@vetrovpartners.com.

— Nodira Yusupova Contributing Regional Analyst — Uzbekistan, Vetrov & Partners vetrovpartners.com/contributions/

Nodira Yusupova advises foreign companies on Uzbek regulatory and tax matters, with a focus on inbound investment, construction sector compliance, and cross-border structuring between Uzbekistan and CIS jurisdictions. She contributes to Vetrov & Partners' Central Asian regional advisory work.