Energy sector regulation in Uzbekistan under the Law on Subsoil: a comprehensive analysis

Foreign investors entering Uzbekistan's energy sector encounter a regulatory environment that has been substantially reshaped since 2019. The Law on Subsoil – Uzbekistan's principal statute governing the exploration and extraction of natural resources, including hydrocarbons and associated minerals – establishes the foundational licensing framework within which all commercial activity in this sector must operate. For in-house counsel and foreign law firms advising clients with Uzbek energy interests, understanding how the Law on Subsoil allocates rights, sets conditions for foreign participation, and interfaces with broader investment legislation is not a preliminary step: it is the precondition for any commercially viable entry into this market. Under Uzbekistan's regulatory architecture, subsoil use rights are granted exclusively by the state, making the licensing relationship with public authorities the defining feature of any energy sector mandate.

The Law on Subsoil defines subsoil as a geological space beneath the surface of the territory of Uzbekistan, including its continental shelf equivalent. Its regulatory scope covers exploration, extraction, and associated processing of mineral and hydrocarbon resources. For foreign investors, the significance of the Law lies not merely in its definitional content but in the rights architecture it creates: subsoil in Uzbekistan is classified as state property, and any commercial use requires a formal grant of subsoil use rights through a licensed procedure.

The Law on Subsoil distinguishes between several categories of subsoil use: geological study (exploration), extraction for commercial purposes, construction and operation of underground facilities, and scientific research. Foreign companies most commonly engage with the first two categories. Geological study licences are typically granted for shorter initial periods, with the right to apply for an extraction licence upon confirmed discovery – a sequenced approach familiar to investors from comparable CIS jurisdictions such as Kazakhstan.

The licensing authority is the relevant state body designated by the Cabinet of Ministers of Uzbekistan, currently operating through the State Committee on Geology and Mineral Resources (Goskomgeo). Foreign companies do not operate directly under the Law on Subsoil in isolation: the regime interacts with the Law on Foreign Investments, the Law on Investment Activities, and – where production sharing is contemplated – the Production Sharing Agreement legislation. Understanding the interplay between these instruments is essential for structuring entry correctly.

One practical implication that frequently surprises foreign counsel familiar with Western hydrocarbon regimes is that Uzbekistan does not operate a purely concession-based model. The predominant contractual instruments for foreign participation are production sharing agreements (PSAs) and investment agreements, each carrying distinct tax, customs, and stabilisation implications. Investors relying solely on their general knowledge of Central Asian energy law without Uzbekistan-specific advice risk mischaracterising the applicable regime at the structuring stage.

[CTA: For foreign counsel or in-house teams mapping Uzbekistan's subsoil licensing framework — make an enquiry: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

The licensing procedure under the Law on Subsoil begins with the identification of a subsoil plot offered by the state or, in limited circumstances, proposed by the applicant on the basis of geological data. Foreign legal entities – including subsidiaries of foreign groups incorporated in Uzbekistan and foreign companies bidding directly – are eligible applicants, subject to compliance with corporate registration requirements and, for certain strategic deposits, additional conditions set by the Cabinet of Ministers.

Licence applications are submitted to Goskomgeo and assessed against criteria including technical competence, financial capacity, and proposed work programme. For hydrocarbons, auctions or tenders are the standard allocation mechanism for commercially significant deposits. The process is less administratively burdensome for exploration licences on less-studied blocks, where direct application remains available.

Once a licence is granted, it is typically accompanied by a licence agreement that specifies production obligations, minimum investment commitments, reporting requirements, and grounds for suspension or revocation. Foreign investors should note that breach of the licence agreement – including failure to meet minimum expenditure thresholds or work programme milestones – can trigger revocation without the procedural protections that might exist under more developed licensing codes. This exposure is not always visible on the face of the Law on Subsoil itself; it becomes apparent in the detailed licence conditions and the practice of Goskomgeo.

A related procedural point concerns environmental permits. Under Uzbekistan's environmental legislation, a state environmental review (ekspertiza) is a prerequisite for extractive operations. This is not a post-licensing formality: delays in obtaining environmental approval can suspend operational timelines by six to eighteen months in practice, a contingency that is routinely underestimated by investors pricing the cost of entry.

For production sharing agreements, the licensing layer sits alongside the PSA itself, which is negotiated separately with the relevant governmental counterparty and ratified by presidential decree. The dual-track nature of this process – licence plus PSA – creates coordination risk if the two instruments are not negotiated in parallel by counsel who understands both tracks.

Uzbekistan has made explicit efforts since 2017 to improve the investment climate, and the Law on Foreign Investments and the Law on Investment Activities together provide a statutory guarantee of legal protection for foreign investors, including in the energy sector. The key protections include a stabilisation clause mechanism – under which the investor may elect to have the tax and regulatory conditions existing at the time of the investment agreement apply for the duration of the project – and a non-discrimination guarantee prohibiting less favourable treatment of foreign investors compared to domestic ones.

For subsoil use specifically, foreign investors operating under PSAs benefit from the contractual stabilisation of the fiscal regime embedded in the PSA itself, which typically overrides general changes in tax legislation for the contract period. This is a materially important feature for long-dated energy projects where legislative change over a twenty-year horizon is a significant modelling variable.

The Law on Subsoil also permits the alienation and encumbrance of subsoil use rights within limits set by the licensing authority. Rights may be transferred to affiliated entities or pledged as security for project finance, subject to prior approval. In practice, the approval process for transfers to affiliates is manageable; third-party transfers are treated with greater scrutiny. Foreign lenders contemplating security over Uzbek subsoil rights need to conduct careful upfront analysis, as the enforceability of a pledge over a state-issued licence right is not equivalent to the enforceability of a pledge over real property or shares under most European security law frameworks.

"In our experience advising foreign companies on energy entry into Uzbekistan, the structural gap that causes the most difficulty is the assumption that a PSA stabilisation clause automatically covers regulatory approvals. It does not – and calibrating that expectation early is the difference between a workable investment thesis and a costly restructuring." — Nodira Yusupova, Contributing Regional Analyst — Uzbekistan, Vetrov & Partners

Dispute resolution deserves specific mention. Uzbekistan is a signatory to the New York Convention and the ICSID Convention, and modern PSAs and investment agreements typically include international arbitration clauses designating ICSID, ICC, or LCIA as the forum. However, the state's position on investment treaty arbitration has been tested in several proceedings, and the practical dynamics of Uzbekistan-related energy arbitration are distinct from the general CIS experience. Foreign counsel instructing on contentious matters should treat Uzbekistan-specific arbitral practice as a separate competence area.

[CTA: For foreign companies structuring energy investments or reviewing PSA terms in Uzbekistan — make an enquiry: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

Uzbekistan is a member of the Commonwealth of Independent States but is not a member of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). This distinction carries material consequences for cross-border Uzbekistan-Russia structures. Unlike transactions routed through Kazakhstan or Armenia – both EAEU members – transactions between Russian and Uzbek entities do not benefit from EAEU customs harmonisation, unified technical regulations, or the EAEU treaty framework for investment protection. Foreign investors structuring Uzbek energy projects through Russian corporate vehicles, or Russian investors entering Uzbekistan, must account for the bilateral treaty layer rather than assuming EAEU disciplines apply.

The bilateral investment treaty between Russia and Uzbekistan remains in force and provides reciprocal investment protections including fair and equitable treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment. For practical purposes, however, the more significant cross-border Uzbekistan-Russia dimension in recent years has been financial: Russian entities with Uzbek energy interests have faced complications arising from the broader international environment in correspondent banking and export credit, which falls outside the scope of either the Law on Subsoil or the bilateral BIT and requires case-by-case structuring analysis.

From a regional counsel perspective, the Uzbekistan energy sector sits within a broader Central Asian competitive landscape. Comparable licensing regimes in Kazakhstan – the region's most mature hydrocarbon jurisdiction – and in Turkmenistan provide useful reference points for foreign investors benchmarking Uzbekistan's terms. The [Regulatory & Licensing](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/regulatory-licensing/) practice at Vetrov & Partners covers all three jurisdictions, which allows for comparative advice on entry structure, licence terms, and dispute risk without requiring clients to coordinate multiple specialist advisers.

For foreign companies with parallel interests in Russian energy assets, the regulatory advice required for Uzbekistan is technically distinct from Russian subsoil law – the two regimes share CIS-era conceptual DNA but have diverged materially in licensing mechanics, PSA regulation, and investor protection architecture. Coordinating both mandates through a firm with regional depth avoids the analytical gaps that arise when Uzbek and Russian elements of a project are advised in isolation.

The following observations reflect documented regulatory practice and are intended for in-house counsel and foreign law firms preparing an Uzbekistan energy entry or reviewing an existing position.

First, commence licensing analysis before corporate structuring. The optimal holding structure for an Uzbek energy investment depends on the type of subsoil right sought, the contemplated contractual instrument (licence agreement or PSA), and the tax treaty position of the ultimate investor. A holding structure designed without reference to these variables will frequently require revision after licensing terms become clear – an expensive sequence.

Second, engage with Goskomgeo at the pre-application stage. The regulatory authority operates a consultation mechanism that, while informal, provides material intelligence on the current availability of blocks, the authority's current priorities, and any procedural updates to the application process. Investors who arrive at the formal application stage without having conducted this preliminary engagement routinely encounter avoidable delays.

Third, assess environmental approval risk on the critical path. As noted above, the state environmental ekspertiza is a hard prerequisite for operations. Commissioning a preliminary environmental baseline assessment at the exploration stage – even before full environmental review is required – provides the investor with a significantly more accurate project timeline and surfaces remediation obligations early.

Fourth, ensure that stabilisation analysis covers both the PSA track and the licence track. PSA stabilisation clauses are well understood; their interaction with regulatory approvals, licence conditions, and Goskomgeo's administrative practice is less well mapped. The practical scope of stabilisation in Uzbekistan is a specialist question, not a general investment law question.

Fifth, prepare for a dual-language documentation environment. All official dealings with Uzbek state authorities are conducted in Uzbek and Russian; English-language documentation requires certified translation at every procedural stage. For foreign law firms coordinating Uzbekistan matters, this has implications for document preparation timelines that should be factored into any court or regulatory deadline analysis.

For companies already holding Uzbek energy licences and facing compliance review, exit planning, or a change-of-control transaction, the [Corporate & Joint Ventures](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/corporate-jv/) and [Regulatory & Licensing](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/regulatory-licensing/) practice pages set out the available advisory support. Cross-border matters involving enforcement of contractual rights or investor-state claims are covered under [Cross-border Disputes](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/disputes/) and [Enforcement of Foreign Judgments & Awards](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/enforcement/).

[CTA: Foreign companies with Uzbek energy investments or subsoil licence questions — make an enquiry: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp/Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76]

• [Doing business in Uzbekistan: a legal overview for foreign investors](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/)
• [Company formation and market entry in Uzbekistan](/jurisdictions/uzbekistan/company-formation/)
• [Regulatory licensing in Kazakhstan: a comparative note](/jurisdictions/kazakhstan/regulatory-licensing/)

Q: What is the Law on Subsoil in Uzbekistan and why does it matter for foreign energy investors? A: The Law on Subsoil is Uzbekistan's principal statute governing the exploration and extraction of mineral and hydrocarbon resources. It establishes the basis on which the state grants subsoil use rights, sets the licensing framework, and defines the conditions under which foreign legal entities may participate in the energy sector. Because all subsoil in Uzbekistan is classified as state property, there is no private subsoil ownership: every commercial energy operation must be founded on a formal grant of rights under this Law, making it the starting point for any legal analysis of an Uzbek energy investment.

Q: Can foreign companies hold subsoil use rights in Uzbekistan directly, or must they operate through a local entity? A: Foreign legal entities may apply for and hold subsoil use rights under the Law on Subsoil, either directly or through a locally registered subsidiary. For most commercially significant deposits – particularly hydrocarbons – a locally incorporated vehicle is standard practice and is often required as a condition of the licence or production sharing agreement. The choice between a branch, representative office, and fully incorporated subsidiary has distinct regulatory and tax implications, and the appropriate form depends on the specific subsoil use category and the contemplated contractual instrument.

Q: What is a production sharing agreement under Uzbekistan law, and how does it differ from a standard licence? A: A production sharing agreement (PSA) is a contractual instrument negotiated between a foreign investor and the Uzbek state under which the investor recovers its costs from production and the remaining output is shared between the investor and the state in agreed proportions. Unlike a standard licence agreement, a PSA is typically ratified by presidential decree and carries its own fiscal regime, including stabilisation provisions. PSAs are used for large and strategically significant deposits; smaller or less commercially certain deposits are more commonly developed under direct licence agreements. The two instruments are not mutually exclusive – a PSA typically presupposes an underlying subsoil licence.

Q: What stabilisation protections are available to foreign investors in Uzbekistan's energy sector? A: Uzbekistan's investment legislation provides two primary stabilisation mechanisms. The general investment law allows investors to lock in the regulatory and tax conditions prevailing at the time of the investment agreement for a specified period. PSAs include project-specific stabilisation clauses that govern the fiscal regime for the entire contract term. However, stabilisation does not extend automatically to all regulatory approvals, environmental requirements, or administrative procedures – these remain subject to general legislative change. The practical scope of stabilisation protection in any given project requires specific analysis of the investment agreement or PSA terms, not reliance on statutory defaults alone.

Q: How are disputes between foreign investors and the Uzbek state resolved in energy sector matters? A: Uzbekistan is a party to both the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and the ICSID Convention, and modern investment agreements and PSAs in the energy sector routinely include international arbitration clauses. ICSID, ICC, and LCIA are the most frequently used forums. Investor-state dispute resolution under Uzbekistan's bilateral investment treaties is also available for treaty investors who have suffered expropriation or breach of fair and equitable treatment standards. In practice, Uzbekistan-specific energy arbitration presents distinct procedural and strategic considerations, and foreign parties should take specialist advice before commencing or responding to proceedings in this context.

Vetrov & Partners is a Russian boutique law firm established in 2009, recognised by Pravo-300 – Russia's principal legal directory – for eight consecutive years. The firm advises foreign companies and their counsel on inbound matters across the CIS region, including Uzbekistan, through a network of verified contributing regional analysts.

The firm's Regulatory & Licensing practice covers market entry, licensing, and regulatory compliance for foreign companies operating in Uzbekistan and neighbouring CIS jurisdictions. Contributing regional analysts embedded in the relevant jurisdiction work alongside the firm's Russian-qualified partners to provide advice that combines local regulatory knowledge with international practice standards. The firm has handled over 1,000 matters since inception, with direct partner involvement on every engagement.

For Uzbekistan-related enquiries: info@vetrovpartners.com | WhatsApp / Telegram: +7 (983) 510-38-76 | t.me/vitvetcom

— Nodira Yusupova Contributing Regional Analyst — Uzbekistan, Vetrov & Partners vetrovpartners.com/contributions/

This publication is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice under Russian or any other applicable law. The information herein should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal counsel tailored to your specific circumstances. Vetrov & Partners is a Russian-qualified law firm. For matters governed by foreign law or requiring local admission in another jurisdiction, we collaborate with trusted counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. For advice regarding your particular situation, please contact info@vetrovpartners.com.